Categories :

What is a better source than Wikipedia?

What is a better source than Wikipedia?

Some online encyclopedias are more reliable than Wikipedia due to different formats and ideology-based approaches. Wikipedia is the largest online encyclopedia at 6.2 million articles and growing. Encyclopedia Britannica Online is the most reliable and respected online encyclopedia, but it requires a subscription.

What is an alternative to Wikipedia?

Britannica, formerly the most referenced encyclopedia on earth, offers up expert summaries of a wide range of topics online. Though it’s been overshadowed by Wikipedia’s crowd-sourced approach in recent years, Encyclopedia Britannica is still one of the most respected reference works in the world.

Is Britannica better than Wikipedia?

Wikipedia scored highest on all criteria except readability, and the authors concluded that Wikipedia is as good as or better than Britannica and a standard textbook.

Why Wikipedia is a bad source?

However, citation of Wikipedia in research papers may be considered unacceptable, because Wikipedia is not a reliable source. This is because Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any moment. Although when an error is recognized, it is usually fixed.

Can u change information on Wikipedia?

Wikipedia is a wiki, meaning anyone can edit nearly any page and improve articles immediately. You do not need to register to do this, and anyone who has edited is known as a Wikipedian or editor. Small edits add up, and every editor can be proud to have made Wikipedia better for all.

Is Wikipedia the best website?

Today, Wikipedia is the eighth-most-visited site in the world. The English-language version recently surpassed 6 million articles and 3.5 billion words; edits materialize at a rate of 1.8 per second. But perhaps more remarkable than Wikipedia’s success is how little its reputation has changed.

Is Scholarpedia trustworthy?

Scholarpedia is a peer-reviewed open-access encyclopedia written and maintained by scholarly experts from around the world.

Is Wikipedia reliable 2020?

Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia. Because it can be edited by anyone at any time, any information it contains at a particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. Therefore, Wikipedia should not be considered a definitive source in and of itself.

Is Wikipedia going broke?

But is the website on the brink of bankruptcy? The answer is no. Run by non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, Wikipedia’s balancesheet looks quite healthy. In fact, its donations have increased many folds in the last seventeen years.

Can you edit Wikipedia without an account?

This is Wikipedia. You do not have to log in to edit, and almost anyone can edit almost any article at any given time. But be aware that the source of an edit is always publicly displayed; making edits with an artificially named Wikipedia account means your account’s name will be linked to every edit.

Where can I find information other than Wikipedia?

Best Wikipedia Alternatives

  1. Encyclopedia Britannica Online. ( In terms of traditional encyclopedias, this is Wikipedia’s main rival.
  2. World Book Online. (
  3. (
  4. Infoplease. (
  5. Citizendium. (

Is information on Wikipedia accurate?

“The study did reveal inaccuracies in eight of the nine entries and exposed major flaws in at least two of the nine Wikipedia articles. Overall, Wikipedia’s accuracy rate was 80 percent compared with 95-96 percent accuracy within the other sources.”

Is the Wikipedia a reliable source of information?

So is Wikipedia a credible source? Many of the entries are well-documented, checked for quality and — as opposed to reference books — often completely up-to-date, but, 20 years after its creation, the online encyclopedia is not 100% reliable, because information can be manipulated, and sometimes almost undetectably.

What are the different types of information sources?

Libraries subscribe to article databases. Those subscriptions make millions of articles available to users at those institutions. Currency : News magazine articles should be current within a few days to a few months of publication. But many magazine articles are based on scholarly articles, so their information is not as new.

Do you cite wikipedia sources in your paper?

The sources you cite in your paper will be the more detailed sources you have used. All you need to do with Wikipedia, then, is thank it in your heart. An encyclopedia is great for checking little details. mercury. In that case, you should recognize the information once you find it, and know it’s right.

What do you need to know about Wikipedia?

All you need to do with Wikipedia, then, is thank it in your heart. An encyclopedia is great for checking little details. mercury. In that case, you should recognize the information once you find it, and know it’s right. Citation is not needed for things that are general